⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
+8Q129-17
-1Q220-16
-9Q323-26
-2Q427-27
▼ SAC better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
22Points off turnovers7
14Offensive rebounds10
11Turnovers15
31Assists24
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 3 | Threes made | 4 |
| 38% | Three-point accuracy | 40% |
| 20 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 54 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 14 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 31 | Assists | 24 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 22 | Points off turnovers | 7 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 6 |
| 8 | Blocks | 6 |
