⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Spurs got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
-8Q118-30
+3Q229-28
+11Q333-25
-9Q417-27
▼ SA better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Spurs won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
5Points off turnovers16
3Threes made8
26Free throws made16
20Assists30
📊The numbers
| MEM | SA | |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 3 | Threes made | 8 |
| 33% | Three-point accuracy | 38% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 16 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 20 | Assists | 30 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 5 | Points off turnovers | 16 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 7 | Steals | 4 |
| 7 | Blocks | 7 |
