⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
+5Q126-23
-1Q218-20
+1Q321-21
-2Q424-26
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 5 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Could not get to the line, ten free throws to their 30
Key battles
26Free throws made9
12Points off turnovers19
12Steals8
5Threes made3
📊The numbers
| SAC | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Shooting from the field | 48% |
| 5 | Threes made | 3 |
| 23% | Three-point accuracy | 27% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 9 |
| 47 | Rebounds | 48 |
| 14 | Offensive rebounds | 15 |
| 20 | Assists | 22 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 12 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 12 | Steals | 8 |
| 3 | Blocks | 2 |
