⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Magic got 23 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
-23Q117-41
+1Q227-28
+9Q335-27
0Q424-23
▼ ORL better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 23 points worse than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Magic won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
4Fast break points14
3Steals10
29%Three-point accuracy56%
21Assists35
📊The numbers
| MEM | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Shooting from the field | 52% |
| 5 | Threes made | 9 |
| 29% | Three-point accuracy | 56% |
| 24 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 53 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 21 | Assists | 35 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 4 | Fast break points | 14 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 3 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
