⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Lakers got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ LAL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 15 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Lakers won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, five turnovers to their thirteen
A 12-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 15 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 15
Q3 10:03 · MIL 61-46 LAL
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 22
Q3 1:21 · MIL 77-55 LAL
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 15-point lead to 23
Q4 4:16 · MIL 89-66 LAL
Bad plays
- Technical
Darvin Ham Technical Foul
Q2 7:07 · MIL 35-26 LAL
Lakers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Robert Horry Technical Foul
Q1 1:40 · MIL 23-15 LAL
📊The numbers
| MIL | LAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 45% |
| 4 | Threes made | 9 |
| 29% | Three-point accuracy | 47% |
| 23 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 50 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 19 | Assists | 22 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 9 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 3 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 2 |
