⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 13 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, ten turnovers to their eighteen, and outscored them 19-6 off them
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 7-point lead to 18
Q3 5:09 · MIL 49-67 SAC
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 16-point lead to 24
Q3 1:50 · MIL 51-75 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 3 | Threes made | 4 |
| 23% | Three-point accuracy | 40% |
| 4 | Free throws made | 10 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 19 | Assists | 29 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 3 | Fast break points | 10 |
| 6 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 18 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 5 | Steals | 11 |
| 4 | Blocks | 6 |
