⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings fell 15 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 15 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Lived at the line, 26 free throws to their sixteen- Looked after the ball, fourteen turnovers to their twenty, and outscored them 24-11 off them
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Wesley Person missed Technical Free Throw.
Q1 2:24 · MEM 17-15 SAC
Kings
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run took them from 3 down to 8 up
Q2 7:07 · MEM 35-43 SAC
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 12-point lead to 23
Q3 5:33 · MEM 61-84 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Vlade Divac Technical Foul
Q1 2:24 · MEM 17-15 SAC
📊The numbers
| MEM | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 50% |
| 4 | Threes made | 7 |
| 29% | Three-point accuracy | 41% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 44 | Rebounds | 54 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 25 | Assists | 30 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 7 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 11 | Points off turnovers | 24 |
| 20 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 6 | Blocks | 9 |
