โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Timberwolves stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
โฒ CLE better than we expected
โผ MIN better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 10 points worse than our numbers for the Cavaliers.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Timberwolves won, and why the Cavaliers did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Cavaliers
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 20-point deficit to 12
Q4 6:37 ยท CLE 80-92 MIN
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 9-point deficit to 1
Q1 3:06 ยท CLE 30-29 MIN
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 10
Q2 1:09 ยท CLE 53-63 MIN
Bad plays
- Technical
Marc Jackson Technical Foul
Q2 5:39 ยท CLE 45-43 MIN
๐The numbers
| CLE | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 8 | Threes made | 3 |
| 42% | Three-point accuracy | 43% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 46 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 24 | Assists | 25 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 8 | Fast break points | 6 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 21 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 8 | Steals | 10 |
| 12 | Blocks | 6 |







