⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ LAC better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 21 points worse than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Clippers did not.
From the game
A 14-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 27 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run from level to 11 points up
Q1 11:08 · SAC 11-0 LAC
- 14-0 run
A 14-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 27
Q3 10:48 · SAC 63-36 LAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Clippers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Goaltend
Defensive Goaltending
Q4 1:16 · SAC 88-80 LAC
- Missed FT
Chris Wilcox missed Free Throw 1 of 2.
Q4 0:30 · SAC 89-82 LAC
📊The numbers
| SAC | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 35% |
| 4 | Threes made | 2 |
| 44% | Three-point accuracy | 29% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 11 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 65 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 19 |
| 22 | Assists | 19 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 7 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 6 | Steals | 9 |
| 7 | Blocks | 3 |
