⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 11 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 11
Q2 11:06 · SAC 35-24 UTAH
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 15-point lead to 25
Q4 11:19 · SAC 92-67 UTAH
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Hedo Turkoglu missed Flagrant Free Throw 1 of 2.
Q4 3:25 · SAC 98-85 UTAH
- Missed FT
Hedo Turkoglu missed Flagrant Free Throw 2 of 2.
Q4 3:25 · SAC 98-85 UTAH
Jazz
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 25-point deficit to 16
Q4 7:43 · SAC 94-78 UTAH
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Tony Massenburg Flagrant Foul Type 1
Q4 3:25 · SAC 98-85 UTAH
📊The numbers
| SAC | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 54% | Shooting from the field | 45% |
| 4 | Threes made | 4 |
| 29% | Three-point accuracy | 29% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 45 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 27 | Assists | 20 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 7 | Fast break points | 2 |
| 18 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 8 | Steals | 10 |
| 3 | Blocks | 5 |
