⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 12 points worse than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Made two threes to their nine
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run dragged them back level
Q2 3:21 · SAC 50-50 MIL
Bad plays
- Technical
Peja Stojakovic Technical Foul
Q4 7:37 · SAC 88-92 MIL
- Technical
Technical Foul
Q4 4:56 · SAC 89-98 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 10
Q4 8:02 · SAC 88-98 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| SAC | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 9 | Threes made | 2 |
| 41% | Three-point accuracy | 22% |
| 18 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 47 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 25 | Assists | 18 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 3 | Fast break points | 6 |
| 12 | Points off turnovers | 12 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 5 | Steals | 7 |
| 3 | Blocks | 4 |
