⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 18 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ LAC better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 13 points worse than our numbers for the Clippers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Clippers did not.
From the game
Made seven threes to their no- Lived at the line, 40 free throws to their twenty
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Clippers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 18
Q2 1:46 · LAC 40-58 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Corliss Williamson technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 3:42 · LAC 37-46 SAC
📊The numbers
| LAC | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Shooting from the field | 44% |
| 0 | Threes made | 7 |
| 0% | Three-point accuracy | 44% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 35 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 5 |
| 26 | Assists | 26 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 6 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 8 | Steals | 6 |
| 11 | Blocks | 4 |
