⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 17 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, fourteen turnovers to their twenty, and outscored them 24-15 off them
A 13-0 run cut a 19-point deficit to 6 in the fourth quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 9
Q1 10:03 · MIL 11-2 MEM
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 18
Q3 6:35 · MIL 66-48 MEM
Bad plays
- Technical
Mo Williams double technical foul
Q2 1:07 · MIL 48-34 MEM
- Technical
Andrew Bogut double technical foul
Q4 7:41 · MIL 88-70 MEM
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 27-point deficit to 17
Q4 10:47 · MIL 85-68 MEM
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run cut a 19-point deficit to 6
Q4 1:47 · MIL 100-94 MEM
Bad plays
- Technical
Hakim Warrick technical foul (2nd technical foul)
Q4 3:04 · MIL 97-81 MEM
📊The numbers
| MIL | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 48% |
| 5 | Threes made | 5 |
| 25% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 41 | Rebounds | 45 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 23 | Assists | 19 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 8 | Fast break points | 5 |
| 24 | Points off turnovers | 15 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 20 |
| 8 | Steals | 2 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
