โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Warriors got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter.
Where it moved
โฒ GS better than we expected
โผ NO better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Warriors.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Warriors won, and why the Pelicans did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, fifteen turnovers to their 21, and outscored them 25-15 off them
Ran them off the floor, 24 fast break points to 9
Could not get to the line, thirteen free throws to their 24
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Warriors
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 15
Q3 1:36 ยท GS 77-62 NO
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Pelicans
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Cedric Simmons technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 2:31 ยท GS 67-60 NO
๐The numbers
| GS | NO | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 43% |
| 8 | Threes made | 4 |
| 29% | Three-point accuracy | 22% |
| 11 | Free throws made | 16 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 29 | Assists | 18 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 24 | Fast break points | 9 |
| 25 | Points off turnovers | 15 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 21 |
| 9 | Steals | 8 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |








