⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 12 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ GS better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 18 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Warriors did not.
From the game
A 12-0 run took them from 1 down to 11 up in the first quarter- Gave up second chances, eighteen offensive rebounds to their eleven
A 12-0 run cut a 35-point deficit to 23 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run took them from 1 down to 11 up
Q1 3:29 · SAC 35-24 GS
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 19-point lead to 31
Q2 6:05 · SAC 66-35 GS
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Warriors
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run cut a 35-point deficit to 23
Q3 0:45 · SAC 101-78 GS
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| SAC | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 37% |
| 10 | Threes made | 8 |
| 40% | Three-point accuracy | 26% |
| 33 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 61 | Rebounds | 60 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 18 |
| 23 | Assists | 17 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 13 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 25 | Points off turnovers | 9 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 20 |
| 14 | Steals | 7 |
| 7 | Blocks | 4 |
