⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 7 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
A 12-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 13 in the second quarter- Burned in transition, 4 fast break points to 18
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 13
Q2 3:20 · SAC 58-45 MIL
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Mike Bibby misses technical free throw
Q1 10:38 · SAC 4-2 MIL
- Missed FT
Kevin Martin misses technical free throw
Q2 7:26 · SAC 39-36 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Ruben Patterson technical foul (2nd technical foul)
Q3 9:12 · SAC 60-51 MIL
📊The numbers
| SAC | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 8 | Threes made | 8 |
| 38% | Three-point accuracy | 38% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 42 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 25 | Assists | 19 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 4 | Fast break points | 18 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 6 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 0 |
