⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Pacers fell 9 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ IND better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 9 points worse than our numbers for the Pacers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Pacers won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Pacers
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 7 down to 3 up
Q2 9:30 · IND 42-39 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 16-point deficit to 8
Q4 5:22 · IND 110-102 MEM
Bad plays
- Turnover
Junior Harrington traveling
Q4 1:07 · IND 112-104 MEM
📊The numbers
| IND | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 5 | Threes made | 4 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 31% |
| 25 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 50 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 16 | Offensive rebounds | 15 |
| 24 | Assists | 17 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 14 | Fast break points | 16 |
| 24 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 7 | Steals | 9 |
| 6 | Blocks | 7 |
