โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 15 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter.
Where it moved
โฒ MIL better than we expected
โผ SAC better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 11 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 7 down to 1 up
Q2 6:52 ยท MIL 41-40 SAC
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Jake Voskuhl flagrant foul type 1 (Francisco Garcia draws the foul)
Q4 8:10 ยท MIL 75-75 SAC
- Turnover
Michael Redd lost ball
Q4 3:57 ยท MIL 85-88 SAC
- Turnover
Michael Redd bad pass
Q4 3:36 ยท MIL 85-90 SAC

Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q4 4:20 ยท MIL 85-93 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| MIL | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 8 | Threes made | 10 |
| 44% | Three-point accuracy | 50% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 4 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 21 | Assists | 25 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 8 | Fast break points | 4 |
| 13 | Points off turnovers | 27 |
| 20 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 7 | Steals | 11 |
| 9 | Blocks | 2 |









