⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bulls got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ CHI better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 16 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bulls won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Could not get to the line, eighteen free throws to their 36- Lost the glass, 9 rebounds to 20
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Royal Ivey technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 10:26 · MIL 47-41 CHI
Bulls
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run dragged them back level
Q2 11:19 · MIL 47-47 CHI
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 21
Q3 2:32 · MIL 99-120 CHI
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 18-point lead to 26
Q4 9:38 · MIL 108-134 CHI
Bad plays
- Technical
Aaron Gray technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 3:47 · MIL 94-110 CHI
📊The numbers
| MIL | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 57% | Shooting from the field | 67% |
| 9 | Threes made | 11 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 46% |
| 26 | Free throws made | 14 |
| 56 | Rebounds | 44 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 3 |
| 33 | Assists | 42 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 20 |
| 13 | Points off turnovers | 20 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 7 | Steals | 11 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |
