โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 17 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
โฒ SAC better than we expected
โผ MIN better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 14 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Timberwolves did not.
From the game
Lost the glass, 36 rebounds to 46
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 8-point lead to 16
Q3 7:28 ยท SAC 75-59 MIN
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Timberwolves
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| SAC | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 10 | Threes made | 6 |
| 43% | Three-point accuracy | 35% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 25 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 57 |
| 5 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 26 | Assists | 13 |
| 0 | Points in the paint | 0 |
| 16 | Fast break points | 14 |
| 23 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 6 | Steals | 3 |
| 9 | Blocks | 5 |









