⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bulls got 13 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ CHI better than we expected
+13Q130-16
+4Q222-18
-3Q319-23
-5Q427-29
▼ WSH better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 13 points better than our numbers for the Bulls.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bulls won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Beaten inside, 26 points in the paint to 42
Key battles
7Fast break points16
29Assists14
9Threes made4
26Points in the paint42
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bulls
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Wizards
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 20-point deficit to 12
Q3 8:48 · CHI 59-47 WSH
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Antawn Jamison misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 2:04 · CHI 91-83 WSH
📊The numbers
| CHI | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 46% |
| 9 | Threes made | 4 |
| 47% | Three-point accuracy | 31% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 12 |
| 45 | Rebounds | 42 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 29 | Assists | 14 |
| 26 | Points in the paint | 42 |
| 7 | Fast break points | 16 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 8 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 6 |
