⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Jazz fell 8 points behind the pace we expected in the third quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Jazz won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Jazz
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run from level to 9 points up
Q1 11:14 · UTAH 11-2 SAC
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 12
Q4 8:57 · UTAH 91-79 SAC
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Kings
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| UTAH | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 44% |
| 7 | Threes made | 8 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 42% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 11 |
| 49 | Rebounds | 47 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 31 | Assists | 17 |
| 56 | Points in the paint | 42 |
| 16 | Fast break points | 17 |
| 23 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 19 |
| 10 | Steals | 9 |
| 4 | Blocks | 4 |
