⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 20 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
0Q120-16
-20Q218-38
+4Q335-28
+3Q429-25
▼ MEM better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 20 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Shot well above their usual, eleven of eighteen from three- Lived at the line, 34 free throws to their 21
- Won the glass, 41 rebounds to 28
- Kept giving it away, 21 turnovers to their twelve
Key battles
15Free throws made28
12Turnovers21
35Rebounds50
44%Three-point accuracy61%
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 19-point deficit to 10
Q3 6:31 · MIL 59-69 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Grizzlies
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MIL | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 52% |
| 11 | Threes made | 11 |
| 44% | Three-point accuracy | 61% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 28 |
| 35 | Rebounds | 50 |
| 5 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 28 | Assists | 24 |
| 30 | Points in the paint | 30 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 21 |
| 9 | Steals | 10 |
| 2 | Blocks | 1 |
