⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hawks got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ ATL better than we expected
▼ IND better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Hawks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hawks won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, eleven turnovers to their 25, and outscored them 32-13 off them
Owned the paint, 54 points inside to 38
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Hawks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 1 down to 9 up
Q4 8:04 · ATL 110-101 IND
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Pacers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Solomon Jones non-unsportsmanlike technical (2nd technical foul)
Q1 1:10 · ATL 22-29 IND
- Missed FT
Danny Granger misses technical free throw
Q4 7:00 · ATL 107-101 IND
- Missed FT
Danny Granger misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 4:54 · ATL 110-102 IND
📊The numbers
| ATL | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 53% | Shooting from the field | 53% |
| 7 | Threes made | 10 |
| 58% | Three-point accuracy | 56% |
| 21 | Free throws made | 21 |
| 41 | Rebounds | 46 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 6 |
| 30 | Assists | 23 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 38 |
| 18 | Fast break points | 17 |
| 32 | Points off turnovers | 13 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 25 |
| 16 | Steals | 1 |
| 6 | Blocks | 4 |




