โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Cavaliers got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
โฒ MIN better than we expected
โผ CLE better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 4 points worse than our numbers for the Timberwolves.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Cavaliers won, and why the Timberwolves did not.
From the game
Made ten threes to their three
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run dragged them back level
Q1 0:20 ยท MIN 25-25 CLE
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Cavaliers
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 1 down to 7 up
Q2 8:30 ยท MIN 29-36 CLE
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Daniel Gibson misses technical free throw
Q1 2:31 ยท MIN 13-21 CLE
๐The numbers
| MIN | CLE | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 48% |
| 3 | Threes made | 10 |
| 21% | Three-point accuracy | 56% |
| 12 | Free throws made | 14 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 50 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 18 | Assists | 24 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 11 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 6 | Steals | 11 |
| 3 | Blocks | 5 |









