⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bulls got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ CHI better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 16 points worse than our numbers for the Bulls.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bulls won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bulls
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run from level to 9 points up
Q1 11:21 · CHI 9-0 MIL
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 3 down to 7 up
Q2 0:19 · CHI 52-45 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Bucks
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 6 down to 3 up
Q2 3:11 · CHI 42-45 MIL
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 7 down to 1 up
Q3 8:22 · CHI 52-53 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| CHI | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 32% |
| 6 | Threes made | 5 |
| 40% | Three-point accuracy | 36% |
| 12 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 47 | Rebounds | 61 |
| 6 | Offensive rebounds | 19 |
| 24 | Assists | 11 |
| 26 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 8 | Fast break points | 8 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 12 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 6 | Steals | 4 |
| 11 | Blocks | 7 |
