⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hawks got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ ATL better than we expected
▼ IND better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Hawks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hawks won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Made eleven threes to their five
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Hawks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 21
Q4 5:48 · ATL 101-80 IND
Bad plays
- Technical
Josh Smith technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q3 7:13 · ATL 62-54 IND
Pacers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| ATL | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 11 | Threes made | 5 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 29% |
| 25 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 12 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 27 | Assists | 17 |
| 32 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 11 | Fast break points | 18 |
| 17 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 4 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
