⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bulls got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ CHI better than we expected
▼ IND better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Bulls.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bulls won, and why the Pacers did not.
From the game
Made fourteen threes to their seven
Looked after the ball, fourteen turnovers to their 21, and outscored them 34-17 off them
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bulls
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 12
Q1 10:55 · CHI 14-2 IND
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 13
Q3 5:52 · CHI 70-57 IND
Bad plays
- Technical
Joakim Noah technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 3:58 · CHI 29-19 IND

Pacers
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Josh McRoberts flagrant foul type 2 (Joakim Noah draws the foul)
Q3 0:02 · CHI 82-65 IND
- Technical
A.J. Price technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q4 4:56 · CHI 105-79 IND
📊The numbers
| CHI | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 39% |
| 14 | Threes made | 7 |
| 45% | Three-point accuracy | 44% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 52 | Rebounds | 43 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 27 | Assists | 14 |
| 34 | Points in the paint | 32 |
| 17 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 34 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 21 |
| 10 | Steals | 4 |
| 9 | Blocks | 4 |

