โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
โฒ MEM better than we expected
โผ MIN better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Timberwolves did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 59 rebounds to 47
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Grizzlies
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 16
Q2 0:31 ยท MEM 50-34 MIN
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 14
Q3 3:02 ยท MEM 64-50 MIN
Bad plays
- Missed FT
O.J. Mayo misses free throw 1 of 2
Q4 0:06 ยท MEM 84-77 MIN

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 16-point deficit to 6
Q3 6:46 ยท MEM 56-50 MIN
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| MEM | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Shooting from the field | 39% |
| 4 | Threes made | 4 |
| 36% | Three-point accuracy | 21% |
| 11 | Free throws made | 14 |
| 66 | Rebounds | 50 |
| 21 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 18 | Assists | 16 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 46 |
| 20 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 22 | Points off turnovers | 15 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 10 | Steals | 10 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |








