⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 8 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Won the glass, 60 rebounds to 50- Looked after the ball, ten turnovers to their seventeen, and outscored them 16-7 off them
A 13-0 run dragged them back level in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q2 5:26 · MIL 43-35 SAC
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 18
Q4 4:30 · MIL 94-76 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Tobias Harris technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 2:03 · MIL 43-35 SAC
- Technical
Drew Gooden technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 2:03 · MIL 43-37 SAC
Kings
Good plays
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run dragged them back level
Q2 11:11 · MIL 34-34 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Jason Thompson technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q3 6:52 · MIL 54-48 SAC
📊The numbers
| MIL | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Shooting from the field | 37% |
| 6 | Threes made | 3 |
| 35% | Three-point accuracy | 16% |
| 14 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 68 | Rebounds | 56 |
| 24 | Offensive rebounds | 16 |
| 22 | Assists | 14 |
| 46 | Points in the paint | 52 |
| 11 | Fast break points | 19 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 7 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 8 | Steals | 3 |
| 6 | Blocks | 6 |
