⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Warriors got 12 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ UTAH better than we expected
▼ GS better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Jazz.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Warriors won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
Shot well above their usual, nine of eighteen from three- Ran them off the floor, 25 fast break points to 5
- A 15-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 19 in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Jazz
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 20-point deficit to 10
Q4 3:56 · UTAH 80-90 GS
Bad plays
- Technical
Enes Kanter technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 9:18 · UTAH 23-31 GS
- Technical
Double technical foul - Derrick Favors and Jarrett Jack
Q2 9:18 · UTAH 23-31 GS
Warriors
Good plays
- 15-0 run
A 15-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 19
Q3 5:15 · UTAH 60-79 GS
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| UTAH | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Shooting from the field | 40% |
| 4 | Threes made | 9 |
| 24% | Three-point accuracy | 50% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 19 |
| 61 | Rebounds | 47 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 9 |
| 17 | Assists | 19 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 32 |
| 5 | Fast break points | 25 |
| 18 | Points off turnovers | 16 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 5 | Steals | 10 |
| 2 | Blocks | 6 |
