โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Timberwolves got 17 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
โฒ MIN better than we expected
โผ NO better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 17 points better than our numbers for the Timberwolves.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Timberwolves won, and why the Pelicans did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 4 down to 6 up
Q1 10:56 ยท MIN 12-6 NO
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 21
Q1 2:49 ยท MIN 35-14 NO
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 23-point lead to 32
Q4 4:30 ยท MIN 106-74 NO
Bad plays
- Technical
Greg Stiemsma technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q4 11:30 ยท MIN 83-55 NO
- Technical
Double technical foul - J.J. Barea and Anthony Davis
Q4 11:07 ยท MIN 85-56 NO

Pelicans
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| MIN | NO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | Shooting from the field | 0% |
| 0 | Threes made | 0 |
| 0% | Three-point accuracy | 0% |
| 0 | Free throws made | 0 |
| 0 | Rebounds | 0 |
| 0 | Offensive rebounds | 0 |
| 0 | Assists | 0 |
| 0 | Points in the paint | 0 |
| 0 | Fast break points | 0 |
| 0 | Points off turnovers | 0 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 0 | Steals | 0 |
| 0 | Blocks | 0 |








