⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 11 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ MIN better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 9 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Timberwolves did not.
From the game
Owned the paint, 50 points inside to 28
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run dragged them back level
Q1 1:59 · MEM 20-20 MIN
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 4-point lead to 14
Q2 0:06 · MEM 53-39 MIN
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 13-point lead to 22
Q3 7:09 · MEM 67-45 MIN
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Timberwolves
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| MEM | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 34% |
| 5 | Threes made | 6 |
| 31% | Three-point accuracy | 25% |
| 7 | Free throws made | 13 |
| 56 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 14 |
| 19 | Assists | 14 |
| 50 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 12 | Fast break points | 15 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 6 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 6 | Steals | 7 |
| 10 | Blocks | 4 |
