⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 20 points ahead of the pace we expected in the fourth quarter. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ CHA better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 13 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Hornets did not.
From the game
Made fourteen threes to their six- Won the glass, 45 rebounds to 32
- Looked after the ball, eleven turnovers to their 21, and outscored them 31-8 off them
- Owned the paint, 52 points inside to 32
- A 15-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 18 in the third quarter
- Could not get to the line, seventeen free throws to their 28
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q2 3:44 · MIL 60-52 CHA
- 15-0 run
A 15-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 18
Q3 3:49 · MIL 103-85 CHA
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 16-point lead to 26
Q4 6:41 · MIL 122-96 CHA
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Hornets
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 5 down to 4 up
Q1 8:11 · MIL 9-13 CHA
Bad plays
- Technical
Gerald Henderson technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q4 2:50 · MIL 127-98 CHA
📊The numbers
| MIL | CHA | |
|---|---|---|
| 51% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 14 | Threes made | 6 |
| 52% | Three-point accuracy | 32% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 22 |
| 51 | Rebounds | 42 |
| 14 | Offensive rebounds | 4 |
| 32 | Assists | 18 |
| 52 | Points in the paint | 32 |
| 15 | Fast break points | 13 |
| 31 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 21 |
| 7 | Steals | 7 |
| 2 | Blocks | 5 |
