⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 8 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ MEM better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 12 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, nine turnovers to their sixteen- A 20-0 run took them from 7 down to 13 up in the first quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 1 down to 7 up
Q1 10:41 · MIL 8-1 MEM
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 14-point deficit to 3
Q2 0:56 · MIL 39-42 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 20-0 run
A 20-0 run took them from 7 down to 13 up
Q1 7:09 · MIL 11-24 MEM
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run took them from 2 down to 10 up
Q4 11:11 · MIL 60-70 MEM
Bad plays
- Goaltend
James Johnson defensive goaltending violation
Q4 1:07 · MIL 77-80 MEM
📊The numbers
| MIL | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Shooting from the field | 40% |
| 6 | Threes made | 5 |
| 30% | Three-point accuracy | 25% |
| 9 | Free throws made | 11 |
| 58 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 15 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 22 | Assists | 20 |
| 36 | Points in the paint | 44 |
| 6 | Fast break points | 5 |
| 11 | Points off turnovers | 8 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 5 | Steals | 7 |
| 5 | Blocks | 10 |
