⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Wizards got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 14 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Wizards won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Made fifteen threes to their four- Shot well above their usual, fifteen of 28 from three
A 13-0 run cut a 23-point deficit to 10 in the second quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 13-0 run
A 13-0 run cut a 23-point deficit to 10
Q2 0:02 · MIL 65-75 WSH
Bad plays
- Turnover
Zaza Pachulia bad pass
Q4 1:17 · MIL 101-109 WSH
Wizards
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q1 0:30 · MIL 27-40 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 12-point lead to 20
Q2 10:00 · MIL 29-49 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 11
Q4 2:00 · MIL 101-112 WSH
Bad plays
- Turnover
Bradley Beal bad pass
Q4 2:57 · MIL 97-104 WSH
📊The numbers
| MIL | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 54% |
| 4 | Threes made | 15 |
| 25% | Three-point accuracy | 54% |
| 25 | Free throws made | 13 |
| 50 | Rebounds | 48 |
| 17 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 14 | Assists | 25 |
| 52 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 11 | Fast break points | 8 |
| 22 | Points off turnovers | 23 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 9 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 7 |
