⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hawks got 15 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ ATL better than we expected
▼ MIA better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 15 points better than our numbers for the Hawks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hawks won, and why the Heat did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Hawks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 11
Q1 11:25 · ATL 12-1 MIA
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 10
Q2 1:07 · ATL 62-52 MIA
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 19
Q4 7:09 · ATL 106-87 MIA
Bad plays
- Technical
Double technical foul - Mike Scott and Shawne Williams
Q4 5:11 · ATL 104-87 MIA
Heat
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
Mario Chalmers technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q4 6:31 · ATL 97-85 MIA
- Technical
Udonis Haslem technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q4 6:31 · ATL 97-85 MIA
📊The numbers
| ATL | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 56% | Shooting from the field | 47% |
| 11 | Threes made | 10 |
| 39% | Three-point accuracy | 48% |
| 19 | Free throws made | 23 |
| 41 | Rebounds | 37 |
| 3 | Offensive rebounds | 5 |
| 33 | Assists | 27 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 32 |
| 12 | Fast break points | 7 |
| 17 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 10 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
