⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings fell 12 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The first quarter was where it moved most, 12 points worse than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
They went cold, three of seventeen from three- Won the glass, 45 rebounds to 35
- A 14-0 run took them from 4 down to 10 up in the third quarter
- Burned in transition, 10 fast break points to 29
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 3 down to 5 up
Q1 10:41 · SAC 8-3 UTAH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 1 down to 7 up
Q2 1:54 · SAC 58-51 UTAH
- 14-0 run
A 14-0 run took them from 4 down to 10 up
Q3 0:39 · SAC 80-70 UTAH
Bad plays
- Turnover
Shot clock turnover
Q4 2:01 · SAC 91-84 UTAH
- Missed FT
Jason Thompson misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 0:36 · SAC 96-88 UTAH
- Missed FT
Jason Thompson misses free throw 2 of 2
Q4 0:23 · SAC 99-91 UTAH
Jazz
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 7 down to 1 up
Q1 7:48 · SAC 12-13 UTAH
Bad plays
- Technical
Enes Kanter technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q3 4:33 · SAC 64-62 UTAH
📊The numbers
| SAC | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 41% |
| 3 | Threes made | 3 |
| 38% | Three-point accuracy | 18% |
| 28 | Free throws made | 25 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 51 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 11 |
| 18 | Assists | 20 |
| 34 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 29 |
| 18 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 8 | Steals | 7 |
| 2 | Blocks | 7 |
