โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Thunder stayed within a few baskets of the pace we expected all game. A much tighter, lower scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
โฒ OKC better than we expected
โผ MIN better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 2 points worse than our numbers for the Thunder.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Thunder won, and why the Timberwolves did not.
From the game
Ran them off the floor, 32 fast break points to 14
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Thunder
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run stretched a 2-point lead to 12
Q1 0:57 ยท OKC 31-19 MIN
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 15
Q2 8:10 ยท OKC 40-25 MIN
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q4 2:49 ยท OKC 92-79 MIN
Bad plays
- Technical
Kendrick Perkins technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 4:16 ยท OKC 42-29 MIN
- Turnover
Shot clock turnover
Q4 0:00 ยท OKC 92-84 MIN

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 15-point deficit to 7
Q2 4:43 ยท OKC 45-38 MIN
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| OKC | MIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Shooting from the field | 34% |
| 4 | Threes made | 2 |
| 20% | Three-point accuracy | 15% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 61 | Rebounds | 61 |
| 14 | Offensive rebounds | 15 |
| 17 | Assists | 13 |
| 44 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 32 | Fast break points | 14 |
| 19 | Points off turnovers | 17 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 9 | Steals | 9 |
| 11 | Blocks | 5 |








