⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 12 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 12 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Made ten threes to their one- Gave up second chances, sixteen offensive rebounds to their nine
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 4 down to 5 up
Q2 11:40 · MEM 34-29 MIL
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q3 3:39 · MEM 73-60 MIL
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Flagrant
Jerryd Bayless flagrant foul type 1 (Mario Chalmers draws the foul)
Q2 10:53 · MEM 28-27 MIL
- Technical
Giannis Antetokounmpo technical foul(2nd technical foul)
Q4 6:30 · MEM 92-71 MIL
📊The numbers
| MEM | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Shooting from the field | 37% |
| 10 | Threes made | 1 |
| 36% | Three-point accuracy | 6% |
| 17 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 46 | Rebounds | 52 |
| 9 | Offensive rebounds | 16 |
| 28 | Assists | 17 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 46 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 11 |
| 13 | Points off turnovers | 18 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 7 | Steals | 8 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
