โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Timberwolves got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
โฒ MIN better than we expected
โผ MEM better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 18 points better than our numbers for the Timberwolves.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Timberwolves won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Made twelve threes to their four
Won the glass, 50 rebounds to 32
Ran them off the floor, 25 fast break points to 11
A 17-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 28 in the second quarter
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Timberwolves
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 11
Q1 4:41 ยท MIN 25-14 MEM
- 17-0 run
A 17-0 run stretched a 11-point lead to 28
Q2 4:46 ยท MIN 62-34 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.

Grizzlies
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run cut a 36-point deficit to 27
Q3 6:01 ยท MIN 83-56 MEM
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
๐The numbers
| MIN | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 55% | Shooting from the field | 36% |
| 12 | Threes made | 4 |
| 60% | Three-point accuracy | 17% |
| 18 | Free throws made | 22 |
| 54 | Rebounds | 41 |
| 10 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 29 | Assists | 10 |
| 42 | Points in the paint | 40 |
| 25 | Fast break points | 11 |
| 29 | Points off turnovers | 24 |
| 21 | Turnovers | 21 |
| 10 | Steals | 17 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |






