โฑ๏ธHow it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks fell 12 points behind the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
โฒ MIL better than we expected
โผ ORL better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 14 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
โ๏ธWhat decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Magic did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, fourteen turnovers to their 25
Ran them off the floor, 27 fast break points to 12
Lost the glass, 37 rebounds to 54
Key battles
๐Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.

Bucks
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run cut a 16-point deficit to 6
Q1 2:04 ยท MIL 22-28 ORL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 8 down to 1 up
Q2 4:58 ยท MIL 43-42 ORL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 2 down to 7 up
Q4 10:00 ยท MIL 83-76 ORL
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Jabari Parker misses free throw 2 of 3
Q4 0:17 ยท MIL 91-87 ORL
- Missed FT
Jabari Parker misses free throw 3 of 3
Q4 0:17 ยท MIL 91-87 ORL
- Missed FT
Jabari Parker misses free throw 1 of 2
Q4 0:04 ยท MIL 93-89 ORL

Magic
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 12
Q1 9:52 ยท MIL 2-14 ORL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 7 down to 2 up
Q3 2:57 ยท MIL 69-71 ORL
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run dragged them back level
Q4 7:39 ยท MIL 85-85 ORL
Bad plays
- Turnover
Nikola Vucevic bad pass
Q4 0:10 ยท MIL 91-87 ORL
๐The numbers
| MIL | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 8 | Threes made | 7 |
| 28% | Three-point accuracy | 28% |
| 15 | Free throws made | 18 |
| 44 | Rebounds | 64 |
| 7 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 25 | Assists | 21 |
| 44 | Points in the paint | 38 |
| 27 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 21 | Points off turnovers | 25 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 25 |
| 16 | Steals | 8 |
| 9 | Blocks | 5 |








