⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 14 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 8 points worse than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Grizzlies did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
J.B. Bickerstaff technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 3:45 · MEM 38-45 SAC
- Technical
David Fizdale technical foul(1st technical foul)
Q2 1:44 · MEM 40-51 SAC
Kings
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Ty Lawson misses free throw 1 of 2
Q4 0:01 · MEM 92-95 SAC
📊The numbers
| MEM | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Shooting from the field | 39% |
| 5 | Threes made | 7 |
| 20% | Three-point accuracy | 29% |
| 29 | Free throws made | 27 |
| 57 | Rebounds | 57 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 19 | Assists | 18 |
| 36 | Points in the paint | 36 |
| 9 | Fast break points | 20 |
| 17 | Points off turnovers | 9 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 7 | Steals | 5 |
| 8 | Blocks | 6 |
