⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Grizzlies got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ MEM better than we expected
▼ MIL better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 8 points better than our numbers for the Grizzlies.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Grizzlies won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Grizzlies
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run from level to 9 points up
Q1 1:00 · MEM 35-26 MIL
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 16
Q3 11:22 · MEM 72-56 MIL
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 6-point lead to 17
Q4 6:07 · MEM 108-91 MIL
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Mike Conley misses technical free throw
Q2 1:37 · MEM 56-45 MIL
Bucks
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
- Technical
delay technical foul
Q4 6:52 · MEM 94-87 MIL
📊The numbers
| MEM | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 52% | Shooting from the field | 46% |
| 14 | Threes made | 14 |
| 52% | Three-point accuracy | 54% |
| 17 | Free throws made | 17 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 35 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 8 |
| 30 | Assists | 21 |
| 38 | Points in the paint | 28 |
| 15 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 20 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 11 | Steals | 6 |
| 0 | Blocks | 5 |
