⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hornets got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ CHA better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 13 points better than our numbers for the Hornets.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hornets won, and why the Wizards did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Hornets
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run took them from 4 down to 4 up
Q1 1:08 · CHA 40-36 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 18-point lead to 26
Q4 2:34 · CHA 133-107 WSH
Bad plays
- Technical
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 3:08 · CHA 67-58 WSH
- Technical
Michael Carter-Williams technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q4 4:00 · CHA 123-101 WSH
Wizards
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 30-point deficit to 19
Q3 2:22 · CHA 102-83 WSH
Bad plays
- Technical
John Wall technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q1 4:16 · CHA 29-21 WSH
- Technical
Scott Brooks technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 6:49 · CHA 53-48 WSH
- Technical
Tim Frazier technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q4 4:00 · CHA 123-101 WSH
📊The numbers
| CHA | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 15 | Threes made | 13 |
| 48% | Three-point accuracy | 57% |
| 22 | Free throws made | 16 |
| 56 | Rebounds | 47 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 5 | Assists | 7 |
| -1 | Points in the paint | -1 |
| 10 | Fast break points | 16 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 20 |
| 4 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 9 | Steals | 16 |
| 18 | Blocks | 23 |
