⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Pacers got 12 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ IND better than we expected
▼ UTAH better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 10 points better than our numbers for the Pacers.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Pacers won, and why the Jazz did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Pacers
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run from level to 9 points up
Q2 8:26 · IND 36-27 UTAH
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run stretched a 1-point lead to 12
Q2 1:56 · IND 53-41 UTAH
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Malcolm Brogdon misses technical free throw
Q1 10:08 · IND 2-5 UTAH
Jazz
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 14-point deficit to 6
Q3 4:01 · IND 81-75 UTAH
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| IND | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 52% | Shooting from the field | 43% |
| 8 | Threes made | 10 |
| 36% | Three-point accuracy | 31% |
| 13 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 55 | Rebounds | 46 |
| 11 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 23 | Assists | 19 |
| 58 | Points in the paint | 46 |
| 18 | Fast break points | 12 |
| 16 | Points off turnovers | 22 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 8 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 2 |
