⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Bucks got 9 points ahead of the pace we expected in the first quarter, then it evened out by full time.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ SAC better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 19 points worse than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Bucks won, and why the Kings did not.
From the game
Shot well above their usual, eighteen of 42 from three- A 15-0 run took them from 4 down to 11 up in the third quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q1 6:14 · MIL 22-14 SAC
- 15-0 run
A 15-0 run took them from 4 down to 11 up
Q3 0:06 · MIL 101-90 SAC
Bad plays
- Missed FT
Khris Middleton misses technical free throw
Q2 7:16 · MIL 42-33 SAC
Kings
Good plays
- 10-0 run
A 10-0 run took them from 8 down to 2 up
Q2 1:59 · MIL 56-58 SAC
Bad plays
- Technical
Kent Bazemore technical foul (1st technical foul)
Q2 7:16 · MIL 42-33 SAC
- Turnover
Harrison Barnes lost ball turnover
Q4 3:49 · MIL 108-100 SAC
📊The numbers
| MIL | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 42% |
| 18 | Threes made | 14 |
| 43% | Three-point accuracy | 33% |
| 19 | Free throws made | 13 |
| 63 | Rebounds | 58 |
| 8 | Offensive rebounds | 10 |
| 26 | Assists | 23 |
| 40 | Points in the paint | 46 |
| 18 | Fast break points | 18 |
| 14 | Points off turnovers | 18 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 5 | Blocks | 5 |
