⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Wizards got 17 points ahead of the pace we expected in the third quarter and stayed there.
Where it moved
▲ GS better than we expected
▼ WSH better than we expected
The third quarter was where it moved most, 11 points worse than our numbers for the Warriors.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Wizards won, and why the Warriors did not.
From the game
Made twenty threes to their nine- Shot well above their usual, twenty of 30 from three
- Looked after the ball, thirteen turnovers to their 22, and were outscored 28-15 off them
- Lost the glass, 34 rebounds to 52
- Beaten inside, 34 points in the paint to 58
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Warriors
Good plays
No play that swung it their way.
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Wizards
Good plays
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run took them from 1 down to 10 up
Q1 10:12 · GS 4-14 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run from level to 8 points up
Q2 1:54 · GS 55-63 WSH
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 9-point lead to 17
Q3 4:57 · GS 66-83 WSH
Bad plays
- Technical
Double technical foul - Anzejs Pasecniks and Jordan Poole
Q4 11:29 · GS 78-96 WSH
📊The numbers
| GS | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Shooting from the field | 49% |
| 9 | Threes made | 20 |
| 32% | Three-point accuracy | 67% |
| 17 | Free throws made | 24 |
| 58 | Rebounds | 41 |
| 18 | Offensive rebounds | 5 |
| 25 | Assists | 24 |
| 58 | Points in the paint | 34 |
| 14 | Fast break points | 24 |
| 28 | Points off turnovers | 15 |
| 22 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 7 | Steals | 10 |
| 7 | Blocks | 5 |
