⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Kings got 10 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ SAC better than we expected
▼ GS better than we expected
The second quarter was where it moved most, 13 points better than our numbers for the Kings.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Kings won, and why the Warriors did not.
From the game
Looked after the ball, six turnovers to their twelve, and were outscored 19-9 off them- A 12-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 22 in the third quarter
A 12-0 run cut a 23-point deficit to 11 in the fourth quarter
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Kings
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 9-point lead to 17
Q3 10:47 · SAC 82-65 GS
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run stretched a 10-point lead to 22
Q3 2:38 · SAC 106-84 GS
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 16-point lead to 24
Q4 2:11 · SAC 139-115 GS
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Warriors
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 2 down to 7 up
Q1 4:13 · SAC 24-31 GS
- 12-0 run
A 12-0 run cut a 23-point deficit to 11
Q4 10:56 · SAC 111-100 GS
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
📊The numbers
| SAC | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| 60% | Shooting from the field | 51% |
| 19 | Threes made | 17 |
| 50% | Three-point accuracy | 53% |
| 16 | Free throws made | 12 |
| 38 | Rebounds | 38 |
| 5 | Offensive rebounds | 7 |
| 28 | Assists | 24 |
| 56 | Points in the paint | 52 |
| 15 | Fast break points | 8 |
| 9 | Points off turnovers | 19 |
| 6 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 6 | Steals | 4 |
| 4 | Blocks | 0 |
