⏱️How it unfolded
The score against the pace we expected, quarter by quarter.
The score, against the pace we expected
The Hornets got 16 points ahead of the pace we expected in the second quarter and stayed there. A much higher scoring game than we expected.
Where it moved
▲ MIL better than we expected
▼ CHA better than we expected
The fourth quarter was where it moved most, 12 points better than our numbers for the Bucks.
⚖️What decided it
Why the Hornets won, and why the Bucks did not.
From the game
Nothing out of the ordinary in the numbers.
Key battles
🏀Good plays, bad plays
The plays that went each side's way, and the ones each side did to itself.
Bucks
Good plays
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 15-point deficit to 7
Q2 7:53 · MIL 41-48 CHA
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run cut a 12-point deficit to 4
Q2 4:49 · MIL 52-56 CHA
- 11-0 run
A 11-0 run cut a 20-point deficit to 9
Q4 2:28 · MIL 115-124 CHA
Bad plays
Nothing costly of their own making.
Hornets
Good plays
- 9-0 run
A 9-0 run took them from 1 down to 8 up
Q1 5:31 · MIL 18-26 CHA
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 5-point lead to 13
Q2 10:49 · MIL 29-42 CHA
- 8-0 run
A 8-0 run stretched a 3-point lead to 11
Q2 1:38 · MIL 55-66 CHA
Bad plays
- Turnover
Shot clock turnover
Q4 0:01 · MIL 119-127 CHA
📊The numbers
| MIL | CHA | |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Shooting from the field | 48% |
| 14 | Threes made | 19 |
| 37% | Three-point accuracy | 38% |
| 17 | Free throws made | 20 |
| 48 | Rebounds | 49 |
| 13 | Offensive rebounds | 13 |
| 23 | Assists | 35 |
| 54 | Points in the paint | 42 |
| 14 | Fast break points | 13 |
| 15 | Points off turnovers | 14 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 20 |
| 10 | Steals | 4 |
| 3 | Blocks | 10 |
